Early in the new year is often a time for renewing subscriptions and that is certainly the case for me—post office, subscriptions to journals, and in my case, renewing my online subscription to the Chicago Manual of Style.
I had heard of the Chicago Manual of Style (CMoS) previously, but it only came fully into focus at the beginning of last year when I was doing the copyedit for The Heir of Night and my US publisher, Voyager (née Eos), advised that they used CMoS as their “house” style guide. (And of course, wise readers that you are, you know I do not mean haute couture.)
What to do? I thought. I don’t know anywhere locally that stocks the CMoS for sale and even if the library has it, I can’t spend the next couple of weeks living day and night under their roof … so of course I went to ‘te search engine’ and found out that—surprise!—you can purchase access to the Chicago Manual of Style Online.
Up until that point I had relied on Strunk and White, The Elements of Style, supplemented by Eats, Shoots & Leaves and a basic facility with English at high school and university—but I recognized that it was time to strike out into deeper waters. And from the moment that I first “opened up” CMoS online, it was a case of true and instant love. Because the CMoS is a source of “great knowledge” and holds the answer to all those gnarly little grammatical questions that plague you when you are at the copyedit and proof edit stage of a manuscript. As the Compleat Angler once was for trout fishermen, so the CMoS is for those who like to cast for and then land good grammar—the perfect life companion for those like me who love to delve down into detail, as well as focus on the grand sweep!
So when I worked my way through the subscription renewal reminders yesterday and came to the CMoS, there was no question or hesitation over renewing for another year—I know that I will not only use the manual extensively as I revise The Gathering of the Lost, The Wall of Night Book Two, but I will enjoy using it as well. In fact—true confession time—I have, um, been known to delve into it ‘just for fun’ …
(I should perhaps also add that the good people at the Chicago Manual of Style offices had no knowledge of the intended writing of this blog post, and certainly no hand in it by means of either coercion or inducement! 🙂 )






















