Floral tributes near Linwood mosque
Last Friday 15, in the early afternoon, what is now believed to be a sole gunman committed a preplanned terrorist attack on the Al Noor and Linwood mosques in my home city of Christchurch. Currently, the death toll stands at 50, with a further 50 suffering injuries that range from critical to minor. The dead include men, women, and children as young as three years old. As I write this, a four-year-old girl is still fighting for her life in Auckland’s Starship Children’s Hospital and I understand that at least two others also remain in critical condition.
I imagine most if not all who read my blog will have already read, heard, or viewed a great deal about this attack and its aftermath on the mainstream and social media. In that respect, there is very little more I can add to the information that is already in the public record, except to say that I fully endorse the sentiments Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has expressed throughout, but particularly in her first press conference on Friday evening. The press conference 
and her statement can be viewed here:
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern: Friday 15 March
Key messages include that this was a very dark day, not just for Christchurch but for New Zealand, and that “we — New Zealand — share common values. And the one that we place the currency on right now … is our compassion and support for the community of those directly affected by this tragedy. And secondly…we utterly reject and condemn … the ideology of the people who did this.”
I also want to express my support for New Zealand’s leaders, who have united in rejecting this terrorist act and in support for the communities of the Al Noor and Linwood mosques, in particular, but also New Zealand’s wider Muslim community.
But I also want to acknowledge the realities such as this report on Radio New Zealand yesterday, setting out how the Islamic Women’s Council in NZ have been lobbying successive governments for the past five years about the need to stem rising hostility, discrimination and Islamophobia in this country, and the lack of a substantive response. In this sense, there has not been only Us and NZ’s wake-up call has come at the cost of 50 lives (so far.)
Hearts on trees, Linwood Avenue
In terms of a personal response, initially I did not want to post at all. I questioned what I, as an individual citizen on the suburban backlines, could say that would be meaningful in the face of such an atrocity. I certainly don’t feel that I can cap or expand on Jacinda Ardern’s words and I know that nothing I say will in any way lesson the wound that has been torn in one of our communities, or ease the grief and turmoil of the survivors, their families and friends, and extended community.
And I also feel, very strongly, that this isn’t about me or my “feelings”. It’s really important that the focus stays on the dead, the wounded, the survivors, the families, and the savagery of this attack on NZ’s Muslim community.
Yet I also believe that giving into that response of “not wanting to” would be an act of cowardice on my part. The nature of terror is to target the innocent and those who do not bear arms, to sow doubt and confusion and fear, and to try and lessen the everyday bonds that knit communities together. Under any circumstances, citizenship is not a spectator sport; it requires commitment of us all, whether the Prime Minister, first responders, and medical professionals on the front lines, or a “just-a-person” Helen on the suburban rear lines.
At present, there may not be a great deal that I can do, in real and practical terms, to honour and fulfil the commitments of citizenship and awhi (support) Christchurch’s Muslim community. But what I can do is to stand up and be counted in terms of saying that I do utterly reject this act and the ideology that has spawned it. I can also consciously think about and strive to empathize with those affected, to “walk-in-the-shoes” of their terror and trauma, devastation, loss and grief. To try and feel their pain as my pain, to make it true and real that rather than “them and us”, in our community there is only Us.
Flowers & message
In terms of tangible actions, my partner and I have donated money to support the victims and the community. We have also, like so many others, taken flowers (from our garden) to leave at the police cordons, which is as close as we can get to the Al Noor and Linwood mosques. The flowers were chosen with regard for the language of flowers: hydrangea for sincere emotion, in this case grief; rosemary, for remembrance; and fern for its NZ meaning of the hope of renewal, as well as the more general meaning of sincerity. The rest of the message was aspirational: There is only Us. And Arohanui, an expression of “great love.” Because we have no white flowers for mourning, each arrangement was wrapped in white paper and tied with a silver ribbon.
Intellectually, I know that this gesture, too, does nothing for the dead and little to help the injured of the two mosque communities or those who now mourn for loved ones. I also know that those whom the flowers and messages are intended to support may never see or read them, since their focus is—necessarily—on the harsh realities of identifying and burying the dead, keeping vigil for the wounded, and supporting those who mourn. Nonetheless, it still felt—and feels—really important to reach out publicly, to express solidarity and support the bonds of community, and to repudiate this act of barbarity, hatred, and violence. In that sense, the message of the flowers and going to the cordons is also for the perpetrator and those who propagate extremism: in this case white supremacists and Islamophobia.
Linwood cordon
In writing this, I also acknowledge that although now is primarily a time for grief, we must already be thinking about what we must do in the future to give effect to that repudiation and to promote healing and peace and inclusion. This means addressing, as communities and a nation, the very real issues raised by the Islamic Women’s Council.
I believe we also need to articulate and understand that grief and trauma are not limited to a particular time and incident, then neatly and tidily over with and done. As Christchurch has most recently learned from the 2010-2011 earthquakes, the effects can be with those affected for years if not for the rest of their lives and take a variety of emotional forms.
Al Noor cordon, Deans Avenue
These effects also emulate rivers that sometimes flow on the surface, and at other times underground, but still make their presence felt in terms of emotional, mental, and physical health and wellbeing. So the kindness and compassion and support the Prime Minister talked about will not be required of our NZ and Christchurch communities only in the immediacy of now, but well into the future.
But in terms of what matters most right now, it has to be about keeping our aroha centered on those most directly affected: the dead, the wounded, the uninjured survivors, the families, their friends, and the wider Muslim community. And about keeping their trauma and loss at the forefront of our hearts and minds, not only now but into the future.
To Donate:
If you wish to donate, I am aware of the following avenues:
NZ Victim Support Fund for Victims of the Christchurch Shootings
The LaunchGood Fund United for Christchurch
The MATW (Muslims Around The World) Fund in partnership with Sonny Bill Williams
The Christchurch Massacre Fund set up by Waikato District Councillor, Jacqui Church
But there may be more.
The 
On 1 March I started a 
Last month, 
In terms of my published work, I believe the historical influence is most evident in Thornspell, which evolved as a Middle European-style kingdom very much in the style of the Holy Roman Empire and its affiliated states in the early Renaissance period. The period is recognized in terms of clothes, technology (which includes armour, weapons etc) and the broadbrush of how the nobility live.
Recently on Good Reads (GR) I was asked a question about worldbuilding. I’m not terribly active on GR because there’s only so much social media a gal can do in a meaningful way and still write books and deal with realtime life, so questions are a relatively rare event. 😉
As I grew up and my original world idea developed, I realized that a dark world, while atmospheric, made for challenging worldbuilding and difficult storytelling, so I revised the “darkness” back to more of a twilit world, with an accompanying stark and bleak landscape, that became the Wall of Night. I also originally thought the wall would be an actual constructed wall (like the Nightwatch’s Wall of Ice in A Game of Thrones) but the more I thought about it the more the “mountain range as shield-wall” idea took hold.
Other “Big Ideas” I (believe I) perceive in Fantasy worldbuilding, which pervade the stories, include:
If you think of a world as being similar to a human body, the spine is the central column, or core idea, that connects everything else.
In order for the world to be real for readers, it must first be real in your mind so that the characters can experience their surroundings in a real way.
Yet it is not enough to simply experience, the characters must also respond emotionally to what they experience. For example, in any given situation, does the character feel fear or horror, foreboding or doubt; happiness or confidence? Do they respond to stimuli with joy and delight, or disgust and loathing?
The reality of the worldbuilding will help you, as author, to know how your characters respond. It will also help your readers not only understand what’s going on for your characters, but to understand environment and world through their senses and perceptions, i.e. the world becomes real for all involved.
