Tuesday Poem: “Leaving”
Leaving
Waiting for the sun to come
creeping slyly up
over the roof of the rusted shed,
melting the frost and glancing
off the old leather suitcase
set down beside the gate.
Don’t look back
at the familiar sweep of hills,
the homestead crouched
in macrocarpa shadow:
feel the day’s first warmth
on your neck, soft as the cat
purring around your ankles –
but don’t look down,
keep both eyes fixed
on that long twist of road
and wait – for the sun,
for the bus,
for the future coming
with a hiss of air brakes
and a spray of gravel.
.
(c) Helen Lowe
Published in before the sirocco, NZ Poetry Society anthology, 2008 (ed. Joanna Preston)
—
“A commonly quoted estimate of out-migration from Christchurch after the February 2011 earthquake is 70,000 people” (Sapere Research Group, April 2011.) One of the results of last weeks 6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, which was the third major earthquake in 9 months and part of a ‘package” that has delivered over 7500 since September 4, 2010, is that a great mamy more people are thinking about their future here and leaving either temporarily or permanently. The Sapere Research Group report goes on, having looked at other disasters of comparable magnitude, to estimate that a more likely estimate of permanent out-migration over a 24 month period is likely to be 2.4%, ca. 10,000.
Whether 70,000 or 10,000 in the longer term, I wanted to post this poem today as a reflection on the emotional cost of a circumstances-driven “leaving home”, both in the sense of “place” as well as family and friends. The poem was written long before September 2010 and is a reflection on the experience of young rural New Zealanders in having to leave home to find work / a career, ie nothing to do with earthquakes or either natural or human-generated disaster.
I also recognise that many of those choosing to leave Christchurch as a result of the earthquakes will do so because they have lost people, homes, businesses and jobs, or simply because they are worn down by the constant shaking, the deprivation and the wider loss of amenity, community and connection to a physical sense of “place.”**
This poem makes no pretence of encompassing that level of severance but I do still hope that it has some relevance to the emotional dimension of “leaving. ”
.
** Note: In terms of that “wider loss of amenity, community and connection to a physical sense of ‘place’ “, two buildings that received considerable further damage as a result of last Monday’s earthquakes were the Anglican Christ Church Cathedral in Cathedral Square and the Roman Catholic Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament in Barbadoes Street—both landmark buildings in Christchurch’s physical cityscape. No official announcement has yet been made, although the “softening up” process has begun through the media, but I understand that both buildings are now to be demolished, either in whole or significant part. I think it is losses such as this that underline that the Christchurch cityscape as we knew and loved it is gone. What will rise from the ruins, phoenix-like or otherwise, remains to be seen.
I almost cried when I heard that both cathedrals have lost the battle with the angry earthquake god and will be demolished. They have been so much part of the Christchurch landscape, it is like losing a friend.
I love the poem btw – beautiful imagery, poignant yet hopeful at same time.
Charlotte: the possibility remains that I have been misinformed—but my informants seem very certain and the arrows of media evidence also point in that direction. I think I may have moved past the sad stage though, into “numb.”
Am glad you enjoyed the poem.:)
It’s all so scary and heart wrenching. Even though your poem was already written, it seems to fit.
Thank you, Chelsea. Scary is the very real prospect of another big one, I think, and what it may bring your way; heart wrenching is what it already has to so many.:-(
Beautiful poem, Helen!
It’s really sad when something you love (part of what you consider home) is destroyed.
In terms of Christchurch I feel as though I am reading Michael Rosen’s Sad Book every day. I try not to dwell on it, but some days you see another, freshly broken building, or newly abandoned business (because the building is too dangerous or can’t be repaired easily or quickly) and you’re back on that sad page.
I think they are hoping to retain the nave of the Catholic Cathedral, but it may not look the same when rebuilt. I love the last three lines of your poem. The future is perhaps what we need to hold on to now.
Catherine, I have always loved that building so much, the pale limestone cladding (over concrete, given its architect Francis Peter pioneered construction in concrete, hence becoming known as “Lord Concrete”), the great dome and the two cupolas against our Canterbury “big sky”–perhaps one should not be attached to “things”, but this particular “thing” I shall personally miss greatly.
Dear Helen, there is a sense of wrench and resoluteness in this poem. . . it’s hard not to read it in the context of all that you are going through in Christchurch. . . sending you love and encouragements, C
Hi Claire—may I say that after last night’s 5.3 quake and a long night of aftershocks I am feeling a considerable wrench of the gut every time that first tremor starts–and considerably less resolute than I did before last Monday! :-/ And although the poem was written for the current context, I too feel that it does speak to it.
That just brought me to tears. It’s exactly how I feel right now. Especially the cat purring around the legs. I’m so sad for the Catholic cathedral too, I loved that building. The whole thing just sucks the life out of you.
But we can’t let it, Wen—suck the life, I mean. Sure we’re going to feel that way some of the time, but then we have to stand up, spit in the eye of fate and carry on. And vow to come to “better” in some way that seems right/best to us.
You are quite right, of course 🙂 It’s onwards and upwards! I was reading somewhere today (I think the ChCh library tweets) about invoking the spirit of the Blitz for Christchurch’s citizens, and you know, I think that’s a very good thing.
We’ve become so used to peace and perfection in our little country that I think we’ve been a bit removed from what it was like to soldier on and deal with real adversity. Thinking about it that way makes it feel more like a community fight than a community being swallowed. I sure hope it raises some spirits 🙂
Wen, I must confess to feeling slightly more reserved about the Blitz analogy because the difference in scope is huge. Firstly, the Blitz was part of a ‘disaster’ that was much larger in both geographic scope and over time (ie the 5-6 years of the war) and the casualties of the Blitz in terms of both human loss of life (ca. 41,000 dead & 49,000 injured in London) and physical devastation (ca. 46,000 buildings lost in London) was much, much larger. Plus, this is peace time–we know that help is coming and actual infrastructure repairs etc have been relatively prompt in most cases (there are a few notable exceptions & I acknowledge these.) In terms of period, the earthquakes here have been more or less continuous over the past 10 months, 293 days to date. The actual period of the Blitz, was broken up into 2 main periods over 4 years: autumn 1940 through to summer 1941 and the “doodlebug” period in 1944–but again the actual damage was much, much greater. Having said that, there was also an actual enemy to fight, which helps with ‘focus’ & ‘resistance’!
So I guess I’m saying that imho the Blitz and our situation are very different—which is not lessening our situation at all; it’s very tough and we do need to work on staying positive and resilient, all those lovely words that the pundits use on our behalf. But despite the flood of blog posts currently coming out of the library (much as I love the library)—it ain’t anything like the Blitz: we got it so good, baby, compared with that!
Ah, I see 🙂 At the time, I took the quote to mean invoking the spirit of the people in those days, the community banding together and can-do spirit of it all, rather than comparing the disasters themselves. There are similarities, but, of course, our disaster hasn’t yet reached that scope. I’m sure there was a similar story to tell in Germany, too. Especially in places like Dresden.
I think you’re quite right about having an enemy to fight, too. I suspect that’s part of why so much anger is being directed at EQC, the government, CERA, etc. Great loss and fear is easier to deal with if you have someone to blame, some sort of reason or sense to it all. It’s hard to find that in Mother Nature.
I suppose that’s a bit of a stumbling block in creating that sort of spirit in Canterbury. There’s a whole lot of anger and no enemy to direct it at, or band against. In some ways, it’d be easier if there were.
Hi Wen, I think you are quite right: I think it is all about the “invoking.” But I guess I’m just “crotchety” and “cantankery” and the more I’ve been thinking about Blitz & Canterbury the more I think that they really aren’t comparable & that we are in fact being a wee bit pretentious by making the comparison. But this is not you, dear Wen, this is just me being “curmudgeonly” about historical comparisons!
I agree with you about the not having an ‘enemy’ to fight being particularly difficult: it does so help the focus and sense of esprit de corps to have someone to squarely and solidly blame and then unite against … 😉 So as you say, we become crotchety with the government and CERA—and those not in other parts blame us for being like that because shouldn’t we be over it by now and not “whining”?
Maybe, to be positive and create more positivity we need to ask ourselves: what’s something positive I can do for one other person outside my family today? What can I give and to who? And what’s something positive I can say to praise and reinforce another person? So a spirit of creating and building rather than ‘resisting’ if you know what I mean?
So a positive thing I can say is: here’s to Wen, who ferried in water to people all over the east side, including me, when we didn’t have any (or only our 3 day reserve anyway) after February 22nd. Definitely making a difference, Canterbury style. Good on ya, Wen!:) And here’s to the guys out fixing the broken water pipe on our street at 7.30 pm on a Saturday night in the dark and the cold. Good on them.
LOL, there’s nothing wrong with a bit of curmudgeonlyness (it’s a word, I swear)!
There are so many wonderful things people are doing out there. Like Dogwatch, they’ve been inundated with dogs in the last few days after the government announcement re: zoning. They had twenty-five more dogs than they had room for, and the Huha trust from Wellington actually flew a whole bunch of the dogs up there to re-home.
And, of course, the wonderful man who saved our little Jayden’s life in the supermarket after the quakes on the thirteenth by giving him CPR after a seizure. Such a hero!
And the NICU nurses during the September quake. One of our favorite nurses apparently threw herself on the floor so she could hold the wheels of one incubator with her hands and another with her feet because the wheels came unlocked and threatened to pull out the ventilator tubes from the babies. How amazing is that?
I have to admit, ferrying the water was as much, if not more, for us than for the people we helped out. The feeling of helplessness was overwhelming and actually having something positive we could made it bearable.
I think that nurse sounds a definite heroine as well—these are the stories I would like to see given as much airtime as the problems. Both are real, both are genuine, both need to be heard—but the positive stories inspire us and help us to keep going.
Am sad I never made it to Christchurch to see the cathedral before the eqs.
It was usually cheaper to go to Australia and visit friends/family.
We must never forget what is due to family and friends, as opposed to monuments …:)
Really no matter how many people stay or go both ways its a hard decision. I know though it must be heartbreaking to see buildings and landmarks like that have to go, because of a senseless natural disaster.
I saw a great line on an earthquake blog the other day: “…random acts of violence of an indifferent planet.” A very nice turn of phrase, I thought, but yes, the human and physical cost is now getting into the “very hard” zone.