
A different sort of “grr argh”
In writing a multi-book story, there are always moments of what I, borrowing from the Buffy ‘verse, describe as moments of “grr-argh”—which in Buffy is what happens when the unwary encounter a vampire. Well, the vampire goes “grr-argh” (or some variant thereof) and the unwary runs away screaming (if they’re lucky…)

Inclusion…
In less elevated environs, such as those surrounding the writing of books, they could also be called moments of hair-tearing, or alternatively, head-desking.
Continuity errors are a reliable source of such moments, i.e. when the author realises they can’t do x-y-z here, as long planned, because way back whenever, the character or characters did a-b-c under the same or near-similar circumstances. So to do x-y-z now would be inconsistent: shock, horror. (Actually, I do in fact, regard continuity errors with ‘fear and loathing.’ Just saying.)

…in any of these…
Another moment-of-headdesk relatively recently was discovering that a minor but fun anecdote/fact I have consistently edited out of the previous three manuscripts because it wasn’t vital to their storylines (and reducing overall word count always a pressing consideration), would have made a really great set-up for something not quite so minor in WALL #4… Headdesk indeed!

…could’ve been good…
This should not, by the way, be confused with that far more major dilemma “writing oneself into a corner.” It just means the author (yep, that’s right: me!) has to work a little harder in this case, to build the setup within this book. Still, definitely a tad frustrating, although probably unsurprising given it is a multi-book story.
Heigh ho… Or to put it another way, just another regular day in the life literaire. đ
â
.
Previous Inside The Writing Life Posts:




I wasnât always a reader of detective novels and police procedurals, but was introduced to them by my sister, primarily through Henning Mankellâs Kurt Wallender novels. Iâm still not a big reader in the genre, but there are some great characters and stories out there to be discovered. Plus when youâre (âone isâ đ ) writing in one field, i.e. fantasy (but even more specifically at present, epic fantasy), reading a completely different kind of story can be really enjoyable, as well as relaxing.
Despite these similarities, if detective fiction is a continuum, then I believe Ann Cleevesâ novels sit closer to those of Kate Atkinson than they do to the works of Henning Mankell, or Lynda La Planteâs Prime Suspect. In the latter two cases, and despite the importance of the character interactions, the crime and the unravelling thereof remain front and centre of the storytelling.
I realise that Iâm not telling you much about the actual plot, instead focusing on what kind of story it isâwhich is what I believe is most important in this case. Being detective/police procedural fiction, itâs a given that there is a crime (in this case a murder), suspects, and an investigation. In The Darkest Evening, both the scene of the murder and some of those present are directly connected with Veraâs own past, which enables the series to develop alongside the specific story being told. Otherwise, if you like the sound of the character-driven storytelling, I can only encourage you to dive in and read. J
It’s been quite a while since I’ve done a Gorgeous Words post, but I can think of absolutely no reason why I shouldn’t dip back in, and add to, an earlier post series — or more of a mini series in this case. đ
I believe Laini Taylor’s prose is lush, in the most positive sense of that word (e.g. luxuriant, abundant, sensory), with poetic rhythm, glorious imagery, and a real knack for evoking emotion and setting.


Tis that time of year again: just as the Northern Hemisphere (NH) year is “closing in” to autumn, with all its colour, followed by winter (yes, indeed-y, “winter is coming” for NH folk) we are starting the swing into spring.





On Twitter, 









