“Snow White & The Huntsman”: A Few of My Terribly Important Thoughts
Yes, I have now seen the film, and so being both a blogger and an SFF/FSF/’speculative fiction’ (although seriously, isn’t all fiction speculative?) blogger to boot, I thought it incumbent upon me to share a few of my terribly important thoughts—aka, ‘wot I fort, roight?!’
Overall, I erred on the side of liking it, but with reservations.
In terms of the positives—well it’s Fantasy and a fairytale retelling of Snow White, so I am already well disposed toward liking. And this film is visually spectacular, so much so that I think I could have enjoyed it for that alone. I loved the music, too, which I thought really worked with the visual strengths of the film. Other positives included some of the magical imagery, such as the crow army at the beginning and the obsidian-glass constructs at the end—and the charge along the beach, while strategically and tactically ludicrous, was again visually rather splendid.
I think it is fitting that the movie poster focuses on Charlize Theron as the wicked Queen and Chris Hemsworth as the Huntsman, as performance-wise I felt they carried the film between them. To the movie’s credit, its makers did try to give Snow White some agency, especially at the beginning and the end, but overall I felt she lacked it—she spent far too much to the film being the ‘beautiful chosen one’ but without much to back it up. Some may blame Kristen Stewart for this, but overall I felt she did a reasonable job with what she was given to work with—but she wasn’t given terribly much. And the character of William, her childhood friend, despite a few “Legolas moments” with the bow, was lacklustre.
My major reservation though, and the reason why I believe the film always felt ‘off its centre’ for me, was because of the plot. Not to put too fine a point on it, I felt the filmmakers didn’t know quite what story they wanted to tell: was it a coming of age story; an adventure yarn; a fantasy-horror; a romance; a movie about the righting of the world’s wrongs? Rather than being coherently one kind of story, a little bit of everything got thrown into the mix—and that’s what it felt like watching it: there was a little taste of a great many elements in the melange, but the overall recipe failed to satisfy.
And I could definitely have done without the whole fairy sanctuary scene, which I really felt was totally unnnecessary—not to mention out-of-keeping with the direction of the rest of the story and its more gritty approach to fairytale retelling.
I had other minor reservations—like the persistence in film of having swords/knives picked up by their blades, which are meant to be killing sharp. Plus a huntsman would be unlikely to carry a war axe. A hatchet for around the hunting camp maybe, but not not a war axe. Just sayin’
But a far more major reservation was the treatment of the traditional seven companions as “comic relief dwarves.” I found it drearily predictable and yes, demeaning. Sigh.
Yet despite all this I still enjoyed the film overall, in a mild sort of a way—chiefly because of the visual spectacle, but also because, despite the plot confusion and failures in the areas mentioned, I felt the film was nonetheless trying to do something a little different, a little more exciting. And it came close enough to succeeding that I could at least perceive what (I felt) they were trying to do.
Some friends and I went to see this on the weekend. You’ve very aptly described my general disquiet with the film. I felt the writers could have dialed back a tab on the ‘battle’ element and used the extra time to actually develop both Snow White personally, and the Huntsman.
That said, the Witch was both scripted and played to perfection, in my opinion. Charlize Theron did an amazing job and stole the whole show.
Agreed.:)
Thanks for these thoughts, Helen – I haven’t been able to make up my mind whether or not to go. I think now it will depend on how well I feel in the next week or so. It’s a good warning, isn’t it, to really delve deeply into revisioning fairytales.
Catty, I still got something out of it despite the flaws and the visuals and score were superb; so i would not discourage anyone from going, but my advisory would be to keep expectations low.
Hehe, how odd that we both decided to post about the same thing on the same day (http://beaulahpragg.com/2012/06/27/disappointment-becomes-inspiration-36-2/)! I totally agree with your assessment though! I wanted to love Snow White, expecially given the trailer. Perhaps one day they’ll get it right!
Beaulah, ‘we should get together & call ourselves an institute’ (a la Paul Simon) 😉 — and just to affirm that, I agree that the trailer left me expecting a lot different story than the film delivered.
Ah well,looks like I’ll catch it on DVD. I wonder if with the success of LOTR and Harry Potter that we have a whole lot of studios wanting to cash in on fantasy but a lack of writers with a certain sensibility to and knowledge of, the genre tropes?
Sean, I think there is certainly a bit of that, looking at the sheer number of fanatsy movies–most of them not terribly good–that have come out over the past few years. But do you have to be familiar with the fantasy tropes I wonder, or just the elements of compelling storytelling? I felt the weakness was more the latter rather than the former in this case… In terms of watching, I would not like to discourage anyone from seeing and deciding for themselves though, and I think the visual spectaculars probably repay the larger screen viewing.
Thanks, Helen.
I was ready to dismiss this movie completely, but a movie podcast I listened to convinced that the movie, with reservations, may be worth renting. In other words, much the same experience as you had.
(Their objections and observations about the strengths and weaknesses were distinctly different, though)
Hi Paul, I don’t think it’s a complete write-off at all, but in terms of what the trailer appeared to promise it definitely disappointed. I would be interested to hear the podcast though, will have a quick check to see if it was on SF Signal…
I saw this movie last night and I liked it. I’ve seen several so-so reviews for it and was starting to worry that it would be a waste of time, but it is worth going to see IMO.
From the trailers, it was very clear that it was a dark fantasy, modern-ist and a re-imaging of the source fairy tale. Seen from that view point, it worked for me as a movie.
I just wish a bit less of the “battle scenes” and more of an explanation of the magic that Snow White appears to be born with, would have helped the story.
I was disappointed with the film experience vis-a-vis what I fewlt the trailer promised, but I agree that Snow White’s powers remained a mystery: as opposed to Queen Ravenna’s for example. There were suggestions of a ‘Fisher King’ / “Excalibur” type explanation, the sovereign wedded to the land but (like so mnay of the plot elements) it never really went anywhere…
so I actually enjoyed the movie quite a bit. many of the little fantasy grove scenes were rather pointless I agree, but didnt detract for me. I am posting to reply to the battle axe concerns. i dont know if most noticed, but the axe was defiitly unique. somone put some thought not only into the knive but the axes.
the largeaxe would have been very common for anyone needing fuel and made more sense that a sword. also in the the martial law-like circumstances the axe makes more sense. But just to geek on the axedetail for a minute, the front of the axe as I recall was a pretty typical blade, butthe rear pole was not a hammer or spike like one would see on battle axe, but and Adze. An adze is a wood working tool for carving out bowles and gutters and holloing out a canoe. If a man were a forester, or a woodsman this is an ideal took to turn his wood into something useful. I have never seen this too placed on the back of an axe. I am so impressed by the thoughtfulness.
as for the knives, so many of his knives were definitly the knives I would use on an elk trip.that large sheath of multiple knives he takes onand off was full of different antler handled knives that all serve different purposes for a man doing butcherind as a woodsman. as a bonus they make excellent weapons and as we say in the warrior art of kali; having one knife is like having one bullet. You need many as they are thrown, get messy and stuck in places you cant get them out. I just wanted to say that aspect of the movie was excellent for me as a hunter and a fighter and made the story more meaningful and enjoyable. enjoyed the other comments
Thanks for your comments, Jeff—really interesting observations, both in terms of what you observed and the detail that those doing the art/armory side of the film obviously put in given your insights. Am I allowed to say that I’m still not 100% sure about the adze though: not that it’s there, but am wondering how practical it would be as a wood-working tool, with the axe on the other side? Or am I being too picky, perhaps? (Am open to the latter observation 😉 )